Comparative Analysis Of Cut & Fill Using Commercial And Open-Source Gis Software

Abstrak

The market offers a diverse array of GIS software, both paid and free. Consequently, it is crucial to identify the most appropriate software for specific spatial analysis applications. This study aims to evaluate and compare two GIS software platforms: ArcMap (ESRI) (commercial) and Quantum GIS (QGIS) (open-source), in performing Cut & Fill analysis. The research addresses key issues such as processing efficiency, functional capabilities, user-friendliness, and cost considerations for users of both software platforms. The study's methodology involves data collection and performing Cut & Fill analysis on both platforms to assess processing efficiency, functionality, user-friendliness, and cost. The findings indicate that ArcMap performs Cut & Fill analysis more rapidly and provides specialized, user-friendly tools, despite its high cost. Conversely, QGIS, while slower and more complex, is more cost-effective and flexible. User feedback highlights the ease of use and accuracy of ArcMap, whereas QGIS is recognized for its affordability and customization capabilities. In conclusion, this study identifies the strengths and weaknesses of both GIS software, providing valuable information for users to select the appropriate software based on specific task requirements and available resources.